dc.contributor.author |
Rytz, U |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Aron, DN |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Foutz, TL |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Thompson, SA |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:43:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:43:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1996 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
09320814 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/971 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030531040&partnerID=40&md5=88e1d5e942eb652f1b0e111fd8b5b244 |
en |
dc.subject |
Composite material |
en |
dc.subject |
External coaptation |
en |
dc.subject |
Rigid coaptation |
en |
dc.subject |
Semi-rigid coaptation |
en |
dc.title |
Mechanical evaluation of soft cast (scotchcast, 3M) and conventional rigid and semi-rigid coaptation methods |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
1996 |
en |
heal.abstract |
New semi-rigid Softcast Scotchcat, 3M (SC) was mechanically evaluated in an in vitro external coaptation model and compared to rigid Vetcast Plus, 3M (VCP), semi-rigid fibreglass slab reinforced modified Robert Jones (SMRJ) bandages, and modified Robert Jones (MRJ) bandages. Vetcast Plus (VCP) was overall the strongest, Scotchcast (SC) was the strongest of the semi-rigid coaptation methods. |
en |
heal.journalName |
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
1 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
9 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
14 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
21 |
en |