| dc.contributor.author |
ISRAILIDES, CJ |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
ICONOMOU, D |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
KANDYLIS, K |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
NIKOKYRIS, P |
en |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:42:35Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:42:35Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
1994 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
0960-8524 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/702 |
|
| dc.subject |
SUGAR-BEET PULP |
en |
| dc.subject |
TRICHODERMA-REESEI |
en |
| dc.subject |
FERMENTATION |
en |
| dc.subject |
MOUSE FEEDING |
en |
| dc.subject.classification |
Agricultural Engineering |
en |
| dc.subject.classification |
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology |
en |
| dc.subject.classification |
Energy & Fuels |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
FERMENTATION |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
STRAW |
en |
| dc.title |
FERMENTABILITY OF SUGAR-BEET PULP AND ITS ACCEPTABILITY IN MICE |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.language |
English |
en |
| heal.publicationDate |
1994 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
Sugar-beet pulp previously heated at 110-degrees-C for 30 min was fermented at 28-degrees-C with Trichoderma reesei in the form of a semi-solid substrate, moisture level 80.0%-85.0%. The resulting product showed a 9.90% average increase in protein at the expense of cellulose and hemicellulose, which were described by 6.40% and 15.0%, respectively. The lignin and ash content of the substrate remained largely unchanged. Feed consumption, weight gain, and acceptability (palatability) trials were run with mice fed a basic &et (control, C) and with added fermented sugar-beet pulp (FSBP) at levels of 15.0% (A 1 diet) and 30.0% (A 2 &et). The mice gained weight with both test diets and with the control. Feed consumption and weight gain of mice were the same for the control diet and the A 1 diet. Feed consumption and weight gains were lower for the A 2 diet than for the control and the A 1 &ets. In free-choice feeding trials the control &et was preferred over the test diets. However, the acceptability did not differ significantly between the two test diets. Feed efficiencies (g weight gain per g feed) were not significantly different between all diets. |
en |
| heal.publisher |
ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
en |
| heal.journalName |
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY |
en |
| dc.identifier.issue |
2 |
en |
| dc.identifier.volume |
47 |
en |
| dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:A1994MX98100001 |
en |
| dc.identifier.spage |
97 |
en |
| dc.identifier.epage |
101 |
en |