dc.contributor.author |
Caputo, V |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Vassilopoulos, A |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Nayga, RM |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Canavari, M |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:52:55Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:52:55Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
00220078 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joca.12009 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/6257 |
|
dc.title |
Welfare Effects of Food Miles Labels |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1111/joca.12009 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2013 |
en |
heal.abstract |
We assessed the consumer welfare effects of two generic food miles labels: ""carbon dioxide (CO2) emission"" label and ""time and number of kilometers"" label. Using data from a choice experiment, our results generally suggest that a mandatory labeling policy for either type of label would have a positive welfare effect. However, a label informing consumers about the time and number of kilometers the food product has traveled provides greater positive welfare effects than a label informing consumers about the amount of CO2 emission. © 2013 by The American Council on Consumer Interests. |
en |
heal.journalName |
Journal of Consumer Affairs |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
2 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
47 |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1111/joca.12009 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
311 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
327 |
en |