| dc.contributor.author |
Centner, TJ |
en |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:52:04Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:52:04Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2012 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
00489697 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.057 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/5830 |
|
| dc.subject |
Damages |
en |
| dc.subject |
Liability |
en |
| dc.subject |
Nuisance |
en |
| dc.subject |
Pesticide drift |
en |
| dc.subject |
Right-to-farm law |
en |
| dc.subject |
Volatilization |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Crop damages |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Crop production |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Damages |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Nuisance |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Policy makers |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Property right |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Right-to-farm law |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Spray application |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Crops |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Cultivation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Product liability |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Vaporization |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Pesticides |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
atrazine |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide residue |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
agricultural policy |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
crop damage |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
legislation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
liability |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide application |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
property rights |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
volatilization |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
agricultural parameters |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
airborne particle |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
court |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
crop damage |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
crop management |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
crop production |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
government regulation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
jurisprudence |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
law |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
law suit |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
legal liability |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
particulate matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pest control |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide spraying |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
priority journal |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
United States |
en |
| dc.title |
Securing recompense under nuisance law for crop damages from pesticide applications |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.057 |
en |
| heal.publicationDate |
2012 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
In areas where several crops are grown or where organic practices have been adopted, conflicts may arise due to the use of pesticides. Accompanying the use of specialized pesticides for individualized crops are possibilities that spray applications or volatilization will result in airborne pesticide particulates damaging nontarget crops. American jurisprudence provides several major causes of action that may be used to secure recompense for damages to crops from applications of pesticides. However, defenses and limitations for each of these causes of action create impediments that make recovery difficult. An evaluation of nuisance law discloses that defenses often preclude recoveries for damages to nontarget crops from airborne pesticide particulates. Policy makers may want to evaluate the defenses due to their interference with property rights. The defenses may discourage changes in crop production resulting in suboptimal uses of resources. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. |
en |
| heal.journalName |
Science of the Total Environment |
en |
| dc.identifier.volume |
432 |
en |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.057 |
en |
| dc.identifier.spage |
78 |
en |
| dc.identifier.epage |
84 |
en |