HEAL DSpace

Performance of three culture media commonly used for detecting listeria monocytogenes

Αποθετήριο DSpace/Manakin

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.contributor.author Andritsos, ND en
dc.contributor.author Mataragas, M en
dc.contributor.author Karaberi, V en
dc.contributor.author Paramithiotis, S en
dc.contributor.author Drosinos, EH en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-06T06:51:58Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-06T06:51:58Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en
dc.identifier.issn 0362028X en
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-556 en
dc.identifier.uri http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/5792
dc.subject.other Listeria monocytogenes en
dc.title Performance of three culture media commonly used for detecting listeria monocytogenes en
heal.type journalArticle en
heal.identifier.primary 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-556 en
heal.publicationDate 2012 en
heal.abstract Listeria monocytogenes poses a serious threat to public health, and the majority of cases of human listeriosis are associated with contaminated food. Reliable microbiological testing is needed for effective control of this pathogen by the food industry and competent authorities. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of three culture media commonly used for detecting L. monocytogenes in foods. Minced pork meat samples (n = 100) were subjected to microbiological testing for L. monocytogenes according to International Organization for Standardization methods 11290-1:1996 and 11290-2:1998 using PALCAM, ALOA, and RAPID'L.mono culture media in parallel. Presence of the pathogen was confirmed by conducting biochemical and molecular tests on the presumptive L. monocytogenes colonies. Performance attributes of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, error odds ratios, receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under this curve were calculated from the presence-absence microbiological test results by combining the results obtained from the culture media and confirmative tests. PALCAM had the best performance in terms of positive predictive value (i.e., a positive result indicates high probability of L. monocytogenes presence) but not in terms of sensitivity (i.e., the ability of the medium to detect the pathogen when present). RAPID'L.mono was the most sensitive medium. None of the culture media were perfect for detecting L. monocytogenes in minced pork meat alone. The pathogen was detected in 16, 19, and 26% (apparent prevalence) of the samples by PALCAM, ALOA, and RAPID'L.mono, respectively, although the true prevalence of the pathogen was 22%. These findings indicate that the use of a single culture medium may lead to erroneous determination of the prevalence of L. monocytogenes. Copyright ©, International Association for Food Protection. en
heal.journalName Journal of Food Protection en
dc.identifier.issue 8 en
dc.identifier.volume 75 en
dc.identifier.doi 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-556 en
dc.identifier.spage 1518 en
dc.identifier.epage 1523 en


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

Αρχεία Μέγεθος Μορφότυπο Προβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στην ακόλουθη συλλογή(ές)

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

Αναζήτηση DSpace


Σύνθετη Αναζήτηση

Αναζήτηση

Ο Λογαριασμός μου

Στατιστικές