dc.contributor.author | Ormsby, R | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kastner, JR | en |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, J | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-06T06:51:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-06T06:51:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 09205861 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.050 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/5726 | |
dc.subject | Carbon | en |
dc.subject | Catalyst | en |
dc.subject | Hemicellulose | en |
dc.subject | Hydrolysis | en |
dc.subject | Solid acid | en |
dc.subject.other | Acid site | en |
dc.subject.other | Active site | en |
dc.subject.other | Active site density | en |
dc.subject.other | Amberlyst-15 | en |
dc.subject.other | ATR FTIR | en |
dc.subject.other | Attenuated total reflectance | en |
dc.subject.other | Biochar | en |
dc.subject.other | Biorefineries | en |
dc.subject.other | Building blockes | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbon catalysts | en |
dc.subject.other | Catalytic testing | en |
dc.subject.other | Forest biorefinery | en |
dc.subject.other | Hemicellulose | en |
dc.subject.other | Hemicellulose hydrolysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Hot water extraction | en |
dc.subject.other | Hydrolysis rate | en |
dc.subject.other | Hydrolysis reaction | en |
dc.subject.other | Kinetic analysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Macroreticular resin | en |
dc.subject.other | Model compound | en |
dc.subject.other | Multiple use | en |
dc.subject.other | Pine chips | en |
dc.subject.other | Slow pyrolysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Solid acid | en |
dc.subject.other | Solid acid catalysts | en |
dc.subject.other | Styrene-divinylbenzene | en |
dc.subject.other | Surface area | en |
dc.subject.other | Working volume | en |
dc.subject.other | Activated carbon | en |
dc.subject.other | Batch reactors | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbohydrates | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbon | en |
dc.subject.other | Catalysts | en |
dc.subject.other | Cellulose | en |
dc.subject.other | Hydrolysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Kraft process | en |
dc.subject.other | Leaching | en |
dc.subject.other | Oligomers | en |
dc.subject.other | Reaction rates | en |
dc.subject.other | Refining | en |
dc.subject.other | Styrene | en |
dc.subject.other | Catalyst activity | en |
dc.subject.other | Activated Carbon | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbohydrates | en |
dc.subject.other | Catalysts | en |
dc.subject.other | Char | en |
dc.subject.other | Hemicellulase | en |
dc.subject.other | Hydrolysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Leaching | en |
dc.subject.other | Oligomers | en |
dc.subject.other | Pyrolysis | en |
dc.subject.other | Refining | en |
dc.title | Hemicellulose hydrolysis using solid acid catalysts generated from biochar | en |
heal.type | journalArticle | en |
heal.identifier.primary | 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.050 | en |
heal.publicationDate | 2012 | en |
heal.abstract | In an integrated forest biorefinery (IFB), hemicellulose is pre-extracted primarily in oligomeric form (e.g., hot water extraction) and the remaining solids (cellulose and lignin) subsequently treated via the Kraft process. Conceptually, hemicellulose can be used as a bio/chemical building block, but requires hydrolysis to monomeric carbohydrates. Selective hemicellulose hydrolysis using reusable solid acid catalysts, generated as a biorefinery co-product, could improve IFB economics. Solid acid carbon catalysts were synthesized from biochar (pine chip or PCC via slow pyrolysis at 400 °C) and wood based activated carbon (AC), and compared with a commercially available sulfonated styrene-divinylbenzene macroreticular resin (Amberlyst 15). The formation of active sites (SO 3H) was verified by base titration, CHNS analysis, and attenuated total reflectance (ATR-FTIR) analysis with each technique indicating higher active site density in the biochar based catalyst (e.g., 0.7 and 0.2 mmol/g for PCC and AC, respectively). Catalytic testing using birchwood xylan as a model compound was performed in batch reactors (working volume 12 mL, 16 wt% catalyst) over a range of temperatures (90-120 °C). Although the biochar surface area was significantly lower than the activated carbon (365 vs. 1391 m 2/g, respectively) hydrolysis rates were significantly higher for the biochar derived catalyst; e.g., an 85% conversion of xylan was observed within 2 h using the biochar, compared to 57% at 24 h for AC (7.7 g L -1, 120 °C). Kinetic analysis clearly indicated that the hydrolysis reaction rate and conversion increased with temperature (85% in 2 h at 120 °C vs. 65% and <5% for 111 °C and 93 °C, respectively). Catalytic activity declined after one recycling (∼14%) and eventually lost all activity after multiple uses (4×). Loss in activity was attributed to a combination of acid site leaching and significant attrition of the biochar. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en |
heal.journalName | Catalysis Today | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 190 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.050 | en |
dc.identifier.spage | 89 | en |
dc.identifier.epage | 97 | en |
Αρχεία | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπο | Προβολή |
---|---|---|---|
Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο. |