| dc.contributor.author |
Cook, KL |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Rothrock, MJ |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Eiteman, MA |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Lovanh, N |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Sistani, K |
en |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:50:56Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:50:56Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
03014797 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.005 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/5233 |
|
| dc.subject |
Amendment |
en |
| dc.subject |
Ammonia |
en |
| dc.subject |
Chitosan |
en |
| dc.subject |
Nitrogen |
en |
| dc.subject |
Poultry litter |
en |
| dc.subject |
Water treatment residuals |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
adsorbent |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
ammonia |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
chitosan |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nitrogen |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
organic nitrogen |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
urease inhibitor |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
adsorption |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
agricultural management |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
ammonia |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
bacterium |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
biological analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
chemical analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
chitin |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
cost-benefit analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
crop production |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
experimental study |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
fungus |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
inhibitor |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
litter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
microbial activity |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nitrogen |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nutrient cycling |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nutrient loss |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
population structure |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
poultry |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
sustainable development |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
water treatment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
agricultural waste |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
chemical analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
concentration (parameters) |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
cost effectiveness analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
law |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
microbial population dynamics |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nonhuman |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
physical chemistry |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
poultry farming |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Adsorption |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Alum Compounds |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Analysis of Variance |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Animals |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Aspergillus |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Bacteria |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Chickens |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Chitosan |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
DNA, Ribosomal |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Imidazoles |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Kentucky |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Manure |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Nitrogen |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Polymerase Chain Reaction |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Sulfuric Acids |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Urease |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Fungi |
en |
| dc.title |
Evaluation of nitrogen retention and microbial populations in poultry litter treated with chemical, biological or adsorbent amendments |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.005 |
en |
| heal.publicationDate |
2011 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
Poultry litter is a valuable nutrient source for crop production. Successful management to reduce ammonia and its harmful side-effects on poultry and the environment can be aided by the use of litter amendments. In this study, three acidifiers, two biological treatments, one chemical urease inhibitor and two adsorber amendments were added to poultry litter. Chemical, physical and microbiological properties of the litters were assessed at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Application of litter amendments consistently reduced organic N loss (0-15%) as compared to unamended litter (20%). Acidifiers reduced nitrogen loss through both chemical and microbiological processes. Adsorbent amendments (water treatment residuals and chitosan) reduced nitrogen loss and concentrations of ammonia-producing bacteria and fungi. The use of efficient, cost-effective litter amendments to maximum agronomic, environmental and financial benefits is essential for the future of sustainable poultry production. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. |
en |
| heal.journalName |
Journal of Environmental Management |
en |
| dc.identifier.issue |
7 |
en |
| dc.identifier.volume |
92 |
en |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.005 |
en |
| dc.identifier.spage |
1760 |
en |
| dc.identifier.epage |
1766 |
en |