| dc.contributor.author |
Kiepper, BH |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Merka, WC |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Fletcher, DL |
en |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:48:07Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:48:07Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
09608524 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.033 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/3966 |
|
| dc.subject |
Microscreening |
en |
| dc.subject |
Particulate matter |
en |
| dc.subject |
Poultry processing |
en |
| dc.subject |
Proximate analysis |
en |
| dc.subject |
Wastewater treatment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Chemical oxygen demand |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Concentration (process) |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Fiber optics |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Gallium alloys |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Moisture |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Tertiary recovery |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Wastewater reclamation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Wastewater treatment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Water treatment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
And recovery |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Crude fibers |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Dry matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Gap size |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
High speeds |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Microscreening |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Nominal gap |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Particulate matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Poultry processing |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Proximate analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Proximate compositions |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Recovery rates |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Total solids |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Treatment area |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Wet weight |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Recovery |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
comparative study |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
concentration (composition) |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
experimental study |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
particulate matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
performance assessment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
poultry |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
vibration |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
waste treatment |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
wastewater |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
chemical composition |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
economic aspect |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
evisceration |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
moisture |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
particulate matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
poultry farming |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
priority journal |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
protein analysis |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
waste water management |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Analysis of Variance |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Animals |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Food-Processing Industry |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Particulate Matter |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Poultry |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Vibration |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Waste Disposal, Fluid |
en |
| dc.title |
Effects of vibratory microscreening on proximate composition and recovery of poultry processing wastewater particulate matter |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.033 |
en |
| heal.publicationDate |
2008 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
Experiments were conducted to compare the effects of tertiary microscreen gap size on the proximate composition and rate of recovery of particulate matter from poultry processing wastewater (PPW). A high-speed vibratory screen was installed within the wastewater treatment area of a southeast US broiler slaughter plant after the existing primary and secondary mechanical rotary screens. Microscreen panels with nominal gap size openings of 212, 106 and 45 μm were investigated. The particulate matter samples recovered were subjected to proximate analysis to determine percent moisture, fat, protein, crude fiber and ash. The average percent wet weight moisture (%WW) content for all samples was 79.1. The average percent dry matter (%DM) fat, protein, crude fiber and ash were 63.5, 17.5, 4.8 and 1.5, respectively. The mean concentration of total solids (TS) recovered from all microscreen runs was 668 mg/L, which represents a potential additional daily offal recovery rate of 12.1 metric tons (MT) per 3.78 million L (1.0 million gallons US) of PPW. There was no significant difference in the performance of the three microscreen gap sizes with regard to proximate composition or mass of particulate matter recovered. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
en |
| heal.journalName |
Bioresource Technology |
en |
| dc.identifier.issue |
18 |
en |
| dc.identifier.volume |
99 |
en |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.033 |
en |
| dc.identifier.spage |
8593 |
en |
| dc.identifier.epage |
8597 |
en |