| dc.contributor.author |
Giannakou, IO |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Karpouzas, DG |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Anastasiades, I |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Tsiropoulos, NG |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Georgiadou, A |
en |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:46:31Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:46:31Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2005 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
1526498X |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.1081 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/3058 |
|
| dc.subject |
Biodegradation |
en |
| dc.subject |
Cadusafos |
en |
| dc.subject |
Fenamiphos |
en |
| dc.subject |
Fosthiazate |
en |
| dc.subject |
Meloidogyne spp |
en |
| dc.subject |
Oxamyl |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
cadusafos |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
carbamic acid derivative |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
fenamiphos |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
fosthiazate |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
organophosphorus compound |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
oxamyl |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
pesticide residue |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
phosphorothioic acid derivative |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
thiazole derivative |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
thiazolidine derivative |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
biodegradation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
fumigant |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
animal |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
drug effect |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
larva |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
nematode |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
oocyte |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
seedling |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
soil |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
tomato |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Animals |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Carbamates |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Larva |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Lycopersicon esculentum |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Nematoda |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Organophosphorus Compounds |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Organothiophosphorus Compounds |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Ovum |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Pesticide Residues |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Pesticides |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Seedling |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Soil |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Thiazoles |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Thiazolidines |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Meloidogyne |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
Meloidogyne javanica |
en |
| dc.title |
Factors affecting the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides for controlling root-knot nematodes |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.identifier.primary |
10.1002/ps.1081 |
en |
| heal.publicationDate |
2005 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
Second-stage juveniles (J2) and egg masses of root-knot nematodes as well as root debris heavily infected by the latter were exposed for different periods of time to six different doses of the nematicides cadusafos and fenamiphos. The efficacy of the nematicides increased significantly with increasing exposure time. Both nematicides were more effective against J2, although they could not provide acceptable control of J2 inside egg masses or heavily galled root debris. The effect of different application strategies on the efficacy and persistence of certain nematicides was also assessed in a field study. Cadusafos, fenamiphos, fosthiazate and oxamyl were applied in field micro-plots either as a single full dose at the time of crop establishment or as multiple reduced-rate applications at 14-day intervals throughout the cropping period, and their efficacy and persistence were determined using bioassays and analytical studies. Fosthiazate was the most efficient nematicide studied, and this was mainly attributed to its long soil persistence. Oxamyl also provided adequate nematode control for the first 48-56 days after its application, regardless of the application method used and its relatively rapid field dissipation. Fenamiphos and cadusafos failed to provide adequate nematode control, although cadusafos was the most persistent of the nematicides tested. The failure of fenamiphos to provide adequate nematode control was mainly attributed to its rapid degradation by soil micro-organisms, which were stimulated after its repeated low-rate application at 14-day intervals. In contrast cadusafos failure was attributed to the inability of the nematicide to reduce nematode populations even at relatively high concentrations in soil. © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry. |
en |
| heal.journalName |
Pest Management Science |
en |
| dc.identifier.issue |
10 |
en |
| dc.identifier.volume |
61 |
en |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1002/ps.1081 |
en |
| dc.identifier.spage |
961 |
en |
| dc.identifier.epage |
972 |
en |