| dc.contributor.advisor |
Harizanis, Paschalis C. |
en |
| dc.contributor.advisor |
Χαριζάνης, Πασχάλις Γ. |
el |
| dc.contributor.author |
Tarantilis, Petros A. |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Polissiou, Moschos |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Alissandrakis, Eleftherios |
en |
| dc.contributor.author |
Αλυσανδράκης, Ελευθέριος |
el |
| dc.contributor.author |
Ταραντίλης, Πέτρος Α. |
el |
| dc.contributor.author |
Πολυσίου, Μόσχος |
el |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2014-06-06T06:46:31Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2014-06-06T06:46:31Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2005 |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
00225142 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1934 |
en |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/3055 |
|
| dc.title |
Evaluation of four isolation techniques for honey aroma compounds |
en |
| heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Hydrodistillation |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Honey aroma compounds |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Micro-simultaneous steam |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Distillation-solvent extraction |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Solid-phase microextraction |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Ultrasound-assisted extraction |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Honey |
en |
| heal.keyword |
MSDE |
en |
| heal.keyword |
SPME |
en |
| heal.keyword |
Aroma |
en |
| heal.identifier.primary |
10.1002/jsfa.1934 |
en |
| heal.recordProvider |
Γεωπονικό Πανεπσιτήμιο Αθηνών/Τμήμα Φυτικής Παραγωγής |
el |
| heal.recordProvider |
Γεωπονικό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών/Γενικό Τμήμα |
el |
| heal.publicationDate |
2005 |
en |
| heal.bibliographicCitation |
Harizanis, Paschalis C. Evaluation of four isolation techniques for honey aroma compounds, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 85 (1), pp. 91-97, Society of Chemical Industry 2005 |
en |
| heal.abstract |
The analysis of the volatile fraction of honey provides useful information for the determination of the botanical and geographical origin. However, the results obtained vary greatly upon the extraction procedure employed. Four different isolation techniques were compared, that is hydrodistillation (HD), micro-simultaneous steam distillation-solvent extraction (MSDE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (USE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). From the data obtained, USE and SPME seem to be more suitable for the isolation of potent marker compounds. HD and MSDE have main drawbacks because of the drastic conditions used that lead to the formation of artefacts and the degradation of sensitive compounds. These drawbacks are avoided when employing USE and SPME. |
en |
| heal.publisher |
Society of Chemical Industry |
en |
| heal.journalName |
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture |
en |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1002/jsfa.1934 |
en |