HEAL DSpace

Soil amendments reduce roof garden weight and influence the growth rate of Lantana

Αποθετήριο DSpace/Manakin

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.contributor.author Panayiotis, N en
dc.contributor.author Panayiota, T en
dc.contributor.author Ioannis, C en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-06T06:45:36Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-06T06:45:36Z
dc.date.issued 2003 en
dc.identifier.issn 00185345 en
dc.identifier.uri http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/2535
dc.relation.uri http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0042127154&partnerID=40&md5=993c8308777e9148b734bd1a9fc05387 en
dc.subject Intensive green roof en
dc.subject Pea en
dc.subject Perlite en
dc.subject Urea-formaldehyde resin foam en
dc.subject Vegetative layer en
dc.subject.other Growth kinetics en
dc.subject.other Porosity en
dc.subject.other Substrates en
dc.subject.other Vegetation en
dc.subject.other Loam soil en
dc.subject.other Soils en
dc.subject.other Lantana en
dc.subject.other Lantana camara en
dc.subject.other Pisum sativum en
dc.title Soil amendments reduce roof garden weight and influence the growth rate of Lantana en
heal.type journalArticle en
heal.publicationDate 2003 en
heal.abstract Four substrates were investigated for their efficacy as roof garden vegetative layers. The substrates comprised a sandy loam soil (S), sandy loam soil amended with urea formaldehyde resin foam (S:F) in a proportion of 60-40 v/v, sandy loam soil amended with peat and perlite (S:P:Per) in a proportion of 50-30-20 v/v and peat amended with urea formaldehyde resin foam (P:F) in a proportion of 60-40 v/v. The substrates were evaluated for their physical and chemical properties and their capacity to sustain growth of Lantana camara L. Physical and chemical evaluation included weight determination at saturation and at field capacity, bulk density determination, water retention, air filled porosity at 40 cm, pH and EC. When compared to the control (S) a weight reduction of 16.8%, 23.9% and 70.3% was obtained at field capacity with S:F, S:P:Per and P:F substrates respectively. Bulk density was reduced by 46%, 43% and 95%, in substrates S:F, S:P:Per and P:F, respectively, compared to the control substrate S. Air-filled porosity at 40 cm was slightly increased for substrate S:F while it was substantially increased for substrate P:F. The pH response between the initiation and the termination of the study was similar for the four substrates. EC decreased in substrates S and S:P:Per but increased in substrates S:F and P:F. Plant growth was monitored as shoot length, shoot number, main shoot diameter and the number of buds and flowers. Substrates S and S:F resulted in similar plant growth, while substrate S:F promoted flowering. Substrate S:P:Per induced slow plant growth during the first 6 months which subsequently increased resulting in a final growth that was satisfactory and comparable to the S and S:F substrates. Substrate P:F did not support sufficient plant growth and its use should be considered only in special cases where reduced weight of the roof garden is imperative. en
heal.journalName HortScience en
dc.identifier.issue 4 en
dc.identifier.volume 38 en
dc.identifier.spage 618 en
dc.identifier.epage 622 en


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

Αρχεία Μέγεθος Μορφότυπο Προβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στην ακόλουθη συλλογή(ές)

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

Αναζήτηση DSpace


Σύνθετη Αναζήτηση

Αναζήτηση

Ο Λογαριασμός μου

Στατιστικές