HEAL DSpace

Phenotypic correlations as substitutes to genetic correlations in dairy sheep and goats

Αποθετήριο DSpace/Manakin

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.contributor.author Kominakis, AP en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-06T06:45:35Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-06T06:45:35Z
dc.date.issued 2003 en
dc.identifier.issn 09312668 en
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00397.x en
dc.identifier.uri http://62.217.125.90/xmlui/handle/123456789/2520
dc.subject.other Capra hircus en
dc.subject.other Mammalia en
dc.subject.other Martes pennanti en
dc.subject.other Ovis aries en
dc.title Phenotypic correlations as substitutes to genetic correlations in dairy sheep and goats en
heal.type journalArticle en
heal.identifier.primary 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00397.x en
heal.publicationDate 2003 en
heal.abstract A data set of n = 67 pairs of genetic and phenotypic correlation estimates for various milk traits, constructed from an exhaustive survey of published estimates in dairy sheep and goats, was used to test whether the phenotypic correlation (rP) may be a suitable replacement of the genetic correlation (rG). Various criteria to assess the closeness of the two estimates were used: Pearson-, Spearman- and bootstrapped- correlations, paired sample t-test and non-parametric tests. Correlations between paired genetic and phenotypic correlation estimates were generally found to be high (from 0.87 to 0.95) and not statistically different between the two species. Employment of a paired sample t-test showed that the average difference between the genetic and phenotypic correlation estimates (d = rG - r P) was significantly (p < 0.05) different from zero only for dairy goats (d = 0.11). Comparisons of correlation estimates either after employment of Fisher's transformation or of a non-parametric test (Kruskall-Wallis) showed that there was statistically no significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two estimates. The main sources of variation for pooled (sheep and goat) d were the year of publication, the method of estimation and the heritabilities of the traits. Furthermore, differences between the two estimates were caused by sampling errors of the genetic correlations. Although average reported standard errors of genetic correlations were found to be about 30% higher than the theoretically expected correlations, the difference between the two errors was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). A simulation study of two correlated traits displaying heritabilities, genetic, environmental and phenotypic correlations equal to the average literature estimates was also performed to investigate the effects of using rP instead of rG on the direct and indirect true selection responses and on the accuracy of the breeding values. Based on the results of the descriptive and simulation analysis for the species, traits and correlation structure examined here, phenotypic correlations may be substituted for genetic correlations when the latter are unavailable or are not precisely estimated. en
heal.journalName Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics en
dc.identifier.issue 4 en
dc.identifier.volume 120 en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00397.x en
dc.identifier.spage 269 en
dc.identifier.epage 281 en


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

Αρχεία Μέγεθος Μορφότυπο Προβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στην ακόλουθη συλλογή(ές)

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

Αναζήτηση DSpace


Σύνθετη Αναζήτηση

Αναζήτηση

Ο Λογαριασμός μου

Στατιστικές